It is time to review the schedule for the placement of your session in the AAACE Agenda. This is the final draft of the Schedule. When you look up your name, use the detail listing to check what days/times you asked to be placed. This is a huge program and we can accommodate necessary changes in day and time now, but may not be able to do so after September 1, 2013 except in emergencies. Please carefully check your placement and send any requests to Ginger Phillips, AAACE Conference Planner with AAACE Session Change Request in the subject line. We will respond to your email, but it may take us up to a week to do so. Thanks for your help in "fine tuning" this agenda!
Pitfalls and Possibilities in Conducting Research Interviews with Participants in Positions of Power
Type of Presentation
Shared
Session Abstract
Interviewing participants in positions of power requires additional preparation to gain access to those in elite-level positions, to minimize power issues, and to share what these participants have to say.
Target Audience
This session will be beneficial to researchers preparing qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Harvey (2011) observes “the general advice that scholars receive on interviewing is by no means the best advice for interviewing elite subjects” (p. 432). The experiences of researchers indicate that the interviewer’s knowledge of the research topic, as well as the interviewee’s background, career, culture, and preferences, helps the researcher gain access to those in positions of power, acquire their trust, and establish rapport. Pre-interview preparation can also “significantly increase the success of interviewing elites by decreasing the status imbalance between researched and researcher” (Mikecz, 2012, p. 483).
Learning Outcomes
During interviews with participants in positions of power, these respondents may take control by limiting their available time, refusing to have their interviews recorded, allowing interruptions, multi-tasking during the interview, promoting their own agendas, and refusing to answer some of the questions. As a result of this session, session attendees will gain information on writing the IRB, using gatekeepers to gain access to elites, collecting background information on the interviewee, minimizing potential power issues, choosing a neutral location for the interview, recording the interview, and using quotations from elites.
Session Description
The term ‘elite’ is associated with power and privilege. Researchers must be aware of both formal and informal power in particular contexts and be able to locate gatekeepers—those persons who can help researchers secure entry to organizations, as well as encourage individuals to participate in research studies. Where an interview takes place affects the degree of formality or informality of the interview, which, in turn, shapes the interview content. Most interviewers recognize that elites prefer open-ended questions. These participants “prefer to articulate their views, explaining why they think what they think” (Aberbach & Rockman, 2002, p. 674). Because elite interviewees are influential and powerful people, a common assumption is that their position is more powerful than that of the interviewer. In most cases, however, the interviewer is likely to be in the position of power, which may, in fact, facilitate the interviewer’s connection with elites.
Efforts are made to try to schedule sessions on the day preferred by the Primary Presenter, though this cannot be guaranteed. Please check your preference.
Thursday November 7
Primary Presenter
Becky C. Smeltzer, UT-MTAS
Work Title
Technical Services Librarian
Additional Presenters: Enters In Order.
Ralph G. Brockett, University of Tennessee
Work Title
Professor