IMPORTANT NOTICE: The date, time, and room assignment of YOUR presentation is SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Proposal authors can use this tool to see where they have been placed in the program agenda for an Oral or Poster Session.
Scroll down to search by the Submitter or Author Name, by Date/Time, or by Keywords by expanding FILTERS.
Confirm your place in the schedule by following the instructions that were emailed to you. Each presentation must have a separate paid registration. Contact the ACCI office immedicately by email at admin@consumerinterests.org to report any conflict, all corrections to the details of the presentation (including author names and the order they are listed as this is how it will be in the final program), or if you have any questions. Please be sure to reference the session title(s), date(s), and time(s) when you contact us.
P112 Cryptocurrency Use Among Banked and Unbanked Americans: Evidence from a National Panel
Short Description
Cryptocurrency is often promoted as a tool for financial inclusion, particularly for individuals who are unbanked or financially vulnerable. This paper evaluates that assumption using nationally representative survey data from over 47,000 U.S. adults across multiple years. We estimate random-effects logistic regression models to examine four types of cryptocurrency use: investment, payments, transfers, and any use. We test how usage varies by banking status, financial vulnerability, financial literacy, and key demographic and socioeconomic factors.
Contrary to popular narratives, we find that unbanked individuals are significantly less likely to use cryptocurrency, even after controlling for income, education, and financial literacy. Financially vulnerable respondents are also less likely to engage with crypto across most use types. Instead, cryptocurrency use is most common among younger, male, employed, college-educated individuals, especially Black Americans. While financial literacy and income interact in some contexts, their effects are inconsistent. The dominant predictors of cryptocurrency use remain age, gender, race, and education. Overall, our results suggest that cryptocurrency adoption in the U.S. is not being driven by economic exclusion but rather by more financially and digitally integrated populations, challenging claims that crypto is currently serving as an alternative for the underserved.
Type of presentation
Accepted Poster Presentation