Passer au contenu principal
logo

2013 Conference

du 10 au 12 April 2013

The Benson Hotel, Portland, Oregon

This section lists poster sessions as well as concurrent sessions by day, time, and room. Concurrent sessions have multiple presentations. You may search by title, author names, or keyword. A Schedule-at-a-Glance is posted on the Website and will provide the overview. This is the detail.

Written Notice of Cooling-Off Periods: A Forty-Year Natural Experiment in Illusory Consumer Protection and the Relative Effectiveness of Oral and Written Disclosures

jeudi 11 avril 2013 à 09:45–11:00 PDT
Brighton Room ( Breakout Session A)
Major Area of Focus

Other

If you selected "Other," please describe in 250 characters or fewer

Federal statutes, state statutes, and federal regulations all oblige merchants to give consumers three days to rescind certain contracts.  This paper reports on a survey of businesses subject to such cooling-off periods.  The study has two principal findings. First, the respondents indicated that few consumers rescind their purchases.  Thus, the study raises doubts about whether cooling-off periods benefit consumers or whether they provide only illusory consumer protection. Second, the study found that consumers who receive both oral and written notice of their rights are more likely to avail themselves of those rights than those who receive only written notices, and that the differences are statistically significant. 

Secondary area of focus

Financial Services

Short Abstract

Federal statutes, state statutes, and federal regulations all oblige merchants to give consumers three days to rescind certain contracts.  This paper reports on a survey of businesses subject to such cooling-off periods.  The study has two principal findings. First, the respondents indicated that few consumers rescind their purchases.  Thus, the study raises doubts about whether cooling-off periods benefit consumers or whether they provide only illusory consumer protection. Second, the study found that consumers who receive both oral and written notice of their rights are more likely to avail themselves of those rights than those who receive only written notices, and that the differences are statistically significant. Finally, the survey asked respondents about the cost of cooling-off periods.   More than four-fifths of the respondents who answered the question reported that the right to cancel had cost them either nothing or very little.

Corresponding Author

[photo]
Jeff Sovern, St. John's University School of Law
Job Title

Professor of Law

City & State (or Province & Country)

Jamaica, NY

Additional Authors

Chargement en cours …